We are undeniably living in an overdiagnosed society. What we are in desperate need of is to slow down. One of my best colleague friends and an amazing trauma therapist describes the therapeutic process as painfully slow. I will expand on this to say not only is this the case, the framework for therapy altogether is narrowed to the class of people who tend toward higher intellectual capability as well as some level of financial stability. This creates extreme prejudice to whether then therapy is beneficial to everyone in the way it is being applied. I will argue that it is not. In training for CANS/ANSA—a prominent screening tool for directing treatment currently, the leader acknowledged “we know what we are doing is most effective for those who need it the least”. In taking the defensive state, he defended why this would be the case and then proceeded with the training without taking pause for consideration that perhaps this model was only effective for those whose brains worked neurotypically, or as the laws of nature would anticipate.
.
Over the course of obtaining my Psychology degree from Purdue University, the overlapping of symptoms in the diagnostic manual for mental health disorders were so convoluted and glaringly obvious. As I briefly entertained the dream of a PhD, I envisioned my dissertation being one that would tear apart the DSM to expose its potential contradictions. As I have continued in both my studies and my practice, I definitely understand the value the DSM provides the professional clinical community. This is a language to differentiate trending patterns of symptoms through discussion in a language of “diagnosis”. These groupings allow comparisons for most effective treatment and have an important place in treatment. As for the layperson and even current professional application of the DSM, consider it about as valuable as WebMD. No wonder we’re all dying of mental cancer at this point!
.
The diagnostic process should be considered the most fascinating and intimate component of mental health treatment. It is multifaceted and should be considered ongoing and ever evolving. Most clinicians will rightfully agree that an accurate diagnosis is most imperative to an ability to provide sound care. The jump to conclusions approach we have developed is far from a means to achieve this end. Many clinicians are unfamiliar with their own implicit biases which are having negative projections on the lens through which they are observing behaviors. This is too often resulting in extreme misdiagnosis and malcare with real, long-term consequence. It has been through the misinterpretation of externally observed behavior without enough additional investigation to the source of the thoughts producing these behaviors where assumptions have been made. In my home it was well reinforced that assuming something only makes an ass of both parties. My literal brain has cautioned me from assigning similar values to behaviors before enough information has been gathered to do this. These quick diagnosis are the most widespread conflict in mental health today. We have Alpha doctors acting from a point of all-out authority making declarations that they do not have the baseline information nor additional follow-up information to make.
.
Many licensed-level professionals do not possess authentic curiosity to what has produced the outcome in the form of individuals behavior. They lack as much patience. This can be seen as a major conflict to having persons in treatment to individuals whose lives they are not interested in. Meanwhile, the majority of their advocating is for their own positions and personal raises. Thank you to the individualism of U.S. of A. Of my own situation I will say that one of the primary issues I had in recovery was the ability to be upset with my early providers. I say this because by the time I was in front of any “professional” to speak of, my symptoms were SO acute, I doubt anyone could have gotten it right. Though, I will never be able to say what official neuropsychiatric testing could have led, it isn’t a helpful thought to entertain for me. I will say as a person of privilege; I have been forced to reconcile that my family did not access their privilege for my diagnostic process. The benefit I can draw is that I received the same run of the mill treatment that others in my same rural town were subject. All that I have gone through since that time allows me to give a voice to so many individuals who were affected similarly and did not get the same chance I did to make something of it. When I did go to treatment, I was completely miserable and had been for some time as previous posts reflect. I had no doubt in my mind I would end up on a full tuition scholarship to a private school, just as both my older siblings had, I just desperately wanted to stop wanting to kill myself. It was my lifelong neighborhood friend who was also going to treatment that convinced me to approach my mother. During the time leading to assessment by local psychiatrist, I saw someone who was not qualified to assign diagnosis for poor counseling. I find it ironic that the date of my first psychiatric assessment was 4/1/2003 – some April Fools that would turn out to be. Still, I struggled to be mad at this dude, who was willing to take on a rural environment. I truly thought he was well intentioned, he was just a shitty doctor, trained by shitty doctors before him.
.
I am in the current position that I possess both an atrocious first assessment in the form of my own and an exceedingly appropriate assessment which took place in the form of my child’s. The distinct difference is that mine was done under the traditional medical standards availed to the public forced by the standards of insurance and my child’s, through a psychology research clinic at a major university. We need to remember that the symptoms for mental health conditions are the same symptoms able to be experienced by any person. We need to be focusing on not only what the abnormality is but to what degree that abnormality is impacting lives. In my time observing, studying, and working in the field of mental health I am inclined to perceive all mood disorders identifying an underlying condition that may be revealed over time as information surfaces. A person’s awareness of their own symptoms and whether or not their thought is irrational should have direction in the stage of treatment they are at. In reviewing diagnosis such as ADHD, it can be easy to associate this with some level of trauma history. For example, we see inattention and this is from a desire to be distracted from a negative thought potentially. With various types of OCD I have deduced them to organized type reactions versus that of disorganized. Those with what I describe as disorganized type OCD, think of things like skin-picking, hoarding, stacking, affinity for ones own waste, the counterintuitive trauma responses. These I have related to those with a trauma that does not make sense to laws of nature in terms of a threat presented. This can be closely linked to paranoia due to the irrational nature. Those who have been through an event that the brain could understand to be threatening leads to organized type reactions. We need to be treating mental health from the inside out rather than the outside in. So often, we are realizing a sensory processing issue has gone missed due to the appearance of irritable, defiant and/or aggressive behavior. This has come to light with our expanded understanding of the autism spectrum specifically. And being attentive to all of this takes both the time and desire of properly trained individuals that the current system does not allow.
.
My personal opinion of diagnosing is to use the least invasive diagnosis possible in order for the person to obtain the necessary level of care for presenting concerns. For example, I have a child with combined type ADHD who showed some symptoms of autism that the university wanted to test further. For people with higher functioning autism, it may be best to avoid an official diagnosis due to the limitations of service options that may be imposed. It should instead be seen as information for the provider working with the person that they have a sensory mind in their processing of the world around them. Currently, we are so confined from providing best care in part due to regulations, For example, we know that an accurate diagnosis is imperative for directing care properly. I have worked with many clinicians who have worked for entities who pushed for specific diagnosis due to an increase in funding that would be associated. Those providers are forced into an ethical dilemma of having the money to provide treatment at all versus the long-term consequence to misdiagnosing an individual with something they may never part from. Many providers currently fall on the diagnosis of “adjustment disorder” which falls under the category of anxiety and is descriptive to most transition periods in life. This tends to be a luxury used by private providers and especially those who do not contract with insurance. Once a person needs medication or hospitalization specifically, the need for specific diagnosis increase – even when it is not most descriptive to the person. This is just a quick run down of the surface level conflict of our current diagnostic process. I fear over time the snowball effect of observation and reflection will produce equally large effect in every direction we choose to explore.
.
#alternativeswithcare #melodramaticmeredith #dearmelodramaticmeredith #holisticcounselor #holisticcounseling #alternativemedicine #mindbody #mentalhealth #mentalhealthawareness #suicideprevention
.
#msw #socialwork #psychology #selfcare #selflove #communitycare #communitylove #mutualaid #neurodivergent #recovery #equality #equity #inclusivity #antioppresive #hope #supportsmallbusiness
.
#spreadlovenothate #unitedwestand #dividedwewillfall #meetmeinthemiddle